PortraitQuest
My Favorite Painting

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Forge of Vulcan was painted in 1630 by the very famous Spanish painter Diego Velázquez of 1599-1660. In this realistic painting, the Roman god Apollo went to the forge of the blacksmith Vulcan, where he told Vulcan about the astonishing news of Vulcan’s wife, Venus, going out with another man. While Apollo is telling Vulcan this news, four cyclopes listen to this shocking news of Venus’ act. In this painting, Velázquez uses oil on a canvas. This smooth texture of the oil helps to make the movement of the painting flow since there are no bumps of paints to interrupt the flow of your eyes.
Also, I think this portrait is the most memorable portrait of all times because Velázquez painted a striking emphasis, which is Apollo. Velázquez painted his focal point Apollo with a halo of light around his head and with breath-taking brighter, more royal clothes than Vulcan and his cyclopes. I love the way the brighter, more vivid Apollo sticks out from the rest, making him more important than the rest of the figures. So, by painting different figures in different ways, and one figure brighter than the rest, Velázquez paints a clear picture of the hierarchy in his picture. Distinguishing the figures by painting them colors of varying intensity gives us an idea of who in the painting is more powerful and who is less.
Also, I really like the rhythm of the reds, browns, and oranges that Velázquez uses to show a balance of colors throughout his picture. The contrast of the vivid reds and oranges of Apollo’s robes with the drab browns of the cyclopes’ and Vulcan’s clothes emphasizes Apollo as the focal point. The repetition of colors, the perfect balance of the colors and shapes, and the contrast of colors between Apollo and the remaining figures all work together to make a beautiful painting that is the most memorable of all time.
One last reason why I really like this painting is that Velázquez painted everything in such detail that when you look at the cyclopes’ and Vulcan’s faces, you can see that their facial hair looks so real that you can actually feel the rough texture of their faces in your hand just by looking at them. Finally, Velázquez uses light so expertly that the light smoothly reflecting off the skin and the armor of the figures shows in great detail the soft, oily, smooth texture of the figures’ skin and armor.

The Forge of Vulcan and the Mona Lisa are both paintings of the realism genre, and they have a few other similarities, but they are very different in many ways. Both the Forge of Vulcan and the Mona Lisa were painted with oil paints. But I think that Diego Velázquez, the artist who painted the Forge of Vulcan, did a better job in using the oil paints to create his painting than Leonardo da Vinci did. I mean sure, Leonardo da Vinci used some important painting techniques to create the Mona Lisa, for example sfumato (which means smoky), a technique of using light and shade to blend the outline of one form into another so that there are no rough outlines on the finished project. But despite the sfumato technique in the Mona Lisa, Velázquez used much brighter oil paints in his painting than da Vinci did, and Velázquez’s vivid reds and oranges really catch your eye better than the Mona Lisa’s dull greens and browns, making the Forge of Vulcan a much more memorable painting. Also, even though both of these paintings utilize the technique of chiaroscuro (the distribution of light and shade in a painting), the Mona Lisa uses mostly very dark black shade with little light while the Forge of Vulcan uses a lot of bright and vivid light with slight shading, which further adds to the appeal of the bright Forge of Vulcan over the dull, depressing Mona Lisa. The light in the Forge of Vulcan bounces off of some figures in such a realistic way that the Forge of Vulcan almost looks like a photograph because it’s so realistic. The Mona Lisa does not look as realistic because the woman does not have realistic features or skin. She has no eyebrows or eyelashes nor wrinkles. Her hands are particularly odd because they don’t show any realistic knuckles or creases. Her sneaky smile makes her look freaky, and so even less realistic. In contrast, the figures in the Forge of Vulcan have these totally realistic facial expressions painted upon their faces because they are everyday expressions. For example, if you look at the cyclopes, you can see that they have a look of astonishment upon their faces, which we all make when we’ve heard something shocking, as the cyclopes have. But the sneaky smile of the Mona Lisa is not a facial expression that we all make frequently, and that combined with the lack of realistic facial features, wrinkles, and creases, take a lot of realism out of the Mona Lisa. Also, the figures in the Forge of Vulcan have so much detail in their bodies that they look as if they’re real and just posing in that position, but the Mona Lisa has no real detail in her body; her body is just unrealistically perfectly smooth skin with no wrinkles or veins to add believable details.

created by Mary