| PortraitQuest | ||||
| My
Favorite Painting |
||||
|
|
The
Forge of Vulcan was
painted in 1630 by the very famous Spanish
painter Diego Velázquez of 1599-1660. In this realistic painting,
the Roman god Apollo went to the forge of the blacksmith Vulcan, where
he told Vulcan about the astonishing news of Vulcan’s wife, Venus,
going out with another man. While Apollo is telling Vulcan this news,
four cyclopes listen to this shocking news of Venus’ act. In this
painting, Velázquez uses oil on a canvas. This smooth texture
of the oil helps to make the movement of the painting flow since there
are no bumps of paints to interrupt the flow of your eyes. The Forge of Vulcan and the Mona Lisa are both paintings of the realism genre, and they have a few other similarities, but they are very different in many ways. Both the Forge of Vulcan and the Mona Lisa were painted with oil paints. But I think that Diego Velázquez, the artist who painted the Forge of Vulcan, did a better job in using the oil paints to create his painting than Leonardo da Vinci did. I mean sure, Leonardo da Vinci used some important painting techniques to create the Mona Lisa, for example sfumato (which means smoky), a technique of using light and shade to blend the outline of one form into another so that there are no rough outlines on the finished project. But despite the sfumato technique in the Mona Lisa, Velázquez used much brighter oil paints in his painting than da Vinci did, and Velázquez’s vivid reds and oranges really catch your eye better than the Mona Lisa’s dull greens and browns, making the Forge of Vulcan a much more memorable painting. Also, even though both of these paintings utilize the technique of chiaroscuro (the distribution of light and shade in a painting), the Mona Lisa uses mostly very dark black shade with little light while the Forge of Vulcan uses a lot of bright and vivid light with slight shading, which further adds to the appeal of the bright Forge of Vulcan over the dull, depressing Mona Lisa. The light in the Forge of Vulcan bounces off of some figures in such a realistic way that the Forge of Vulcan almost looks like a photograph because it’s so realistic. The Mona Lisa does not look as realistic because the woman does not have realistic features or skin. She has no eyebrows or eyelashes nor wrinkles. Her hands are particularly odd because they don’t show any realistic knuckles or creases. Her sneaky smile makes her look freaky, and so even less realistic. In contrast, the figures in the Forge of Vulcan have these totally realistic facial expressions painted upon their faces because they are everyday expressions. For example, if you look at the cyclopes, you can see that they have a look of astonishment upon their faces, which we all make when we’ve heard something shocking, as the cyclopes have. But the sneaky smile of the Mona Lisa is not a facial expression that we all make frequently, and that combined with the lack of realistic facial features, wrinkles, and creases, take a lot of realism out of the Mona Lisa. Also, the figures in the Forge of Vulcan have so much detail in their bodies that they look as if they’re real and just posing in that position, but the Mona Lisa has no real detail in her body; her body is just unrealistically perfectly smooth skin with no wrinkles or veins to add believable details. |
|||
| created by Mary | ||||